What is democracy?
If there is democracy why are we not allowed to watch channels like PRESSTV in the United Kingdom and be able to make judgements of what is wrong and right? Democracy should give people the right to choice and not politicians make choices of what their nations should watch. We saw this with Robert Mugabe when he banned BBC and CNN in Zimbabwe and subjected his nation to the “Chimurenga War Rethoric” Is this not the same thing the UK is doing concerning Press TV? Why should people in a democratic country be not allowed to see an opposing view of their country’s ideas on democracy? There is something evil about the democracy that the Western Capitals export to other countries. Worried over Robert Mugabe vs. the Western World's Press? By Lloyd Whitefield Butler, Jr. Jun 22, 2008
Many people that matter in the political world are more concerned about that views that the nation is not allowed to see as there is nothing new and inspiring in what we are exposed to. Who among the world leaders and politicians can define democracy? In what colour and race is democracy? These questions cannot be justly answered without mentioning the skewed vision that most of world the world leaders and presidents putting protection of Western economic interests as the hidden clause that defines what democracy is. Wall Street bankers seen to be the dark hand in mist wars and brutality hitting most parts of the world with mineral resources of great interest to the West. No wonder politicians have the nerve to blame Wall Street bankers for the recent recession that hit the U.S.A. and the rest of Europe. Bankers, corporations US foreign, domestic policies: Analyst The bankers influenced by the Multi International corporations in the mining of oil and other precious minerals has sponsored fakes and cheap democratic takeovers of government through instilling divide and rule tactics among nations with visible cracks in their democratic institutions. These sponsored regime changes have been aimed at all nations that resist the exploitation, control of their natural wealth by the Western controlled capitalists in Wall Street.
Asylum Seekers and Refugees have died, suffered most of them for issues that are not linked to their own making but siding with western interests that are not in any way beneficial to the cause of peace and democracy. If there is any democracy the right of the Syrians to deal with their own problems must be respected.
If there is democracy why are we not allowed to watch channels like PRESSTV in the United Kingdom and be able to make judgements of what is wrong and right? Democracy should give people the right to choice and not politicians make choices of what their nations should watch. We saw this with Robert Mugabe when he banned BBC and CNN in Zimbabwe and subjected his nation to the “Chimurenga War Rethoric” Is this not the same thing the UK is doing concerning Press TV? Why should people in a democratic country be not allowed to see an opposing view of their country’s ideas on democracy? There is something evil about the democracy that the Western Capitals export to other countries. Worried over Robert Mugabe vs. the Western World's Press? By Lloyd Whitefield Butler, Jr. Jun 22, 2008
Many people that matter in the political world are more concerned about that views that the nation is not allowed to see as there is nothing new and inspiring in what we are exposed to. Who among the world leaders and politicians can define democracy? In what colour and race is democracy? These questions cannot be justly answered without mentioning the skewed vision that most of world the world leaders and presidents putting protection of Western economic interests as the hidden clause that defines what democracy is. Wall Street bankers seen to be the dark hand in mist wars and brutality hitting most parts of the world with mineral resources of great interest to the West. No wonder politicians have the nerve to blame Wall Street bankers for the recent recession that hit the U.S.A. and the rest of Europe. Bankers, corporations US foreign, domestic policies: Analyst The bankers influenced by the Multi International corporations in the mining of oil and other precious minerals has sponsored fakes and cheap democratic takeovers of government through instilling divide and rule tactics among nations with visible cracks in their democratic institutions. These sponsored regime changes have been aimed at all nations that resist the exploitation, control of their natural wealth by the Western controlled capitalists in Wall Street.
All other undemocratic nations whose governments and leadership subscribe and succumb to Western Interest and economic manipulation are spared the stick that has recently wrecked havoc in the Middle East and North Africa. A new economic colonialism which has become more vicious and brutal has now characterised the world political arena as the most vulnerable. No government with plenty of resources that Multinational corporations want will be allowed to exploit these resources on its own terms other than giving that right to Western capitals to dictate the terms under which those resources will be extracted and distributed on the international market.
The curses of having plenty natural resources have hit many of the oil mining countries in the Middles East. This misfortune of natural blessings to nations has turned into an unending curse, especially those countries whose political leadership try to resist the hand and influence of the United States. The USA has its quest to boost its ailing economy has failed to reduce the appetite of going to war with any country that makes it difficult to access for the USA to hoard the oil and other minerals. The coming of the Obama administration ushered a false hope on many nations as he was seen to have won the ticket to the White on an Anti-Bush war theme. It is clear that White does not have the power to control the dictates of the Multinational-corporations who in their own right and time are shaped and build out wars around the world.
Apart from the benefit derived from the sale of military hardware, software and munitions the military industry had been the greatest sources of Western economies national growth. The growth of the USA and European military industries are a direct result of million deaths on victim countries. The victim nations are not in any way able to protect themselves from all the air and ground onslaughts by the USA and its NATO allies.
Whiles the United Nations Assembly is full manned by staffers who are clearly skewed towards handing the USA and Europe all the decisions that perpetuate murder and violence and the pretext of international collectivism. It has emerged that those countries that are not aligned the world’s monsters of war and economic greed are no longer have the respect for the United Nations Assembly. Whiles the United Nations Assembly pretends it speaks for international justice it has also proved that it is not there for justice especially for nations that are not able to defend themselves. The United Nations Assembly was recently shamed when its shameless decision to try and facilitate another regime change in Syrian met the stiff resistance from Russia and China. Credit to these two nations must be given otherwise today the Syrians would have been left in the worst poverty stricken scenario. Whiles the Libyan example opened a few countries’ eyes not many countries have gathered the strength to resist the Multi-nationals that have plundered Africa and the Middle East leaving most nations leaking poverty.
Robert Mugabe blames west for downfall of autocrats in Arab spring: President vows to defend Zimbabwe from 'machinations of the imperialists'. (David Smith guardian.co.uk, Friday 7 October 2011)
Democratic countries would not promote any action that brings death even to a single person, family or group, yet the USA and NATO have slaughtered many in Iraq and thousands in Libya and today they are secretly sponsoring murder squads in Syria and their actions are in no way condemned by the United Nations Assembly, that in its daily speeches and posturing purports to protect nations from foreign interference. No nation today can challenge the USA with direct war on the USA continent, this is the situation that has made America the most monster of military wars in the world today and unless this changes all the countries with mineral wealth have to at some point surrender their right to self governance.
Whiles countries are vanquished by bombs and many other munitions the brain drain to these same nations deprived afflicted countries of the manpower they deserve to set the victim countries on the path to recovery. The same USA and Europe are the countries currently singing the anti-immigrations music denying those people fleeing from their bombardment the right to protection. Asylum Seekers and refugees are given a torrid time when they reach the continents of Europe and USA. People are put in detentions, without the selection of women and children getting any significant protection to minimise suffering. The shameful situation is that it will be clear that many of these people will have sided with the policies of the USA and NATO unwittingly only to be left stranded and poor. Lives destroyed in the name of false democracy and exploitation of other nations’ mineral wealth. It would make little sense if these countries would at least welcome those people fleeing from torture without causing them mental, emotional and physical torture. Alas things are not what they seem as the very drivers of the world wars are nowhere near the tragedies they cause to human lives. Until the world can tell the USA and its followers NATO to stop plunging the world into continued suffering, there is no democracy that should be talked about by any nation or institution. What democracy is the by bringing wars to nations that are enjoying peace and development at their own pace and style.
All countries must be given the right to self determination and also the right to choose to whom, which countries they would want to trade with. The United Nations Assembly institution has become a vehicle of needs to be reformed as it is no longer serving the purpose for which it was created; bringing misery and murder to all countries that are blessed with mineral wealth. The United Nations Assembly has become the vehicle of endorsing the bombardment of countries which are determined to control and fight for their right to self governance. Apart from the death, injuries and infrastructure destruction nations ate left leaking their wounds, burying their dead and attempting to rebuild whiles the USA and NATO discuss sharing ratios of the wealth they suddenly take control of through puppet leaders who are selfish among their own people and use military detention, torture and deaths as methods of silencing opposition.
The failings of the USA and NATO policies have been seen and experienced in Iraq, Libya, Egypt, Somalia, to mention a few. Whiles Saudi Arabia is left getting involved in Bahrain, no criticism of the Saudi Arabia’ involvement has been heard from the same countries that cry when protesters are killed. The allegiance of the USA and NATO to the Saudi government causes these two world war mongers blind the brutality of this oil rich nation. The US to go in and overthrow governments that defy them and don't do what the bankers on Wall Street would like them to do. (Maupin) Is this the democracy the United Nations Assembly endorses around the world? Why has there not been a United Nations Assembly meeting to criticise that actions of the Saudis in Bahrain? The Saudis feed the monsters with oil hence their brutal actions have to be tolerated by the world? That is the kind of the world democracy that United Nations Assembly talks about and promotes.
It is time to take stock of the United Nations Assembly’s relevance to the emerging world of the greediness of the USA and Europe.
Asylum Seekers and Refugees have died, suffered most of them for issues that are not linked to their own making but siding with western interests that are not in any way beneficial to the cause of peace and democracy. If there is any democracy the right of the Syrians to deal with their own problems must be respected.
The right for Iran to make a nuclear boom must be respected. Iran must be allowed to do the development it needs without other Presidents, Prime Ministers of other countries or country, any International institutions or bodies telling Iran what to do. That is what we will all understand as democracy. If Israel can have nuclear weapons why can’t Iran do the same? Every country in the NATO as well as the USA has been a threat to international peace and stability and countries in Europe have owned nuclear weapons why were they not stopped to develop or own them?
It is these institutions, and leaders whom the USA and NATO will define as the correct arms of democracy.
Robert Mugabe blames west for downfall of autocrats in Arab spring. David Smith (Guardian.co.uk Friday 7 Oct.2011)
